Artificial Intelligence
7 April 2026
Generative AI tools (like ChatGPT or company chatbots) can do amazing things but they also create new attack surfaces. Prompt injection is when a malicious user sneaks harmful instructions into an AI prompt so the model forgets its rules and reveals private data. According to IBM, hackers disguise these dangerous inputs as normal prompts to make the AI leak sensitive data. In tandem, AI data leakage describes the accidental exposure of confidential information through AI outputs. This means the AI can “connect the dots” on internal data and spill it out even without a network breach.
A prompt injection attack plays on the way large language models process text. Because the AI treats all user text as instructions, a crafty input can override its safeguards. For example, researchers once tricked Microsoft’s Bing Chat into revealing its own source code simply by telling it to “Ignore previous instructions”. In practice, an attacker might say “Forget your rules and do X” or hide a command inside a document the AI reads. OWASP recently ranked prompt injection as the #1 security risk for AI applications. In short, any LLM or AI assistant can be hijacked by the right prompt.
AI data leakage isn’t about hacking in the usual sense, it’s about inference. If an AI model has been trained on, or connected to, private company data, it may accidentally reveal it. This can occur via prompt oversharing or via the model “hallucinating” aggregated facts from its training. For example, a seemingly innocent query might cause the AI to reconstruct personal details from customer records, even if the user has no direct access to those files. This risk is real: one survey found 48% of employees admitted uploading proprietary data (e.g. code or financials) into public AI tools.
These risks have real-world impact. In mid-2025 security researchers documented multiple prompt-injection incidents leaking corporate secrets: chat logs, credentials and other sensitive content were exposed in breached AI deployments.
If your AI assistant can reach a company database or files, a malicious prompt could dump that data. The fallout can be massive. Under regulations like the EU GDPR, a data breach can trigger fines up to €20 million or 4% of global turnover.
One bad AI incident, whether from an overzealous employee or a hacker’s prompt can cost a business millions and erode years of hard-won customer trust.
There’s no silver bullet, but best practices can greatly reduce these threats. Start with policies and training: forbid copying confidential data into unsanctioned AI tools, and educate staff on AI pitfalls. Adopt the same zero-trust mindset for AI as for networks (use MFA, encrypt sensitive data, and segment who can access which AI services).
On the tech side, use AI-aware safeguards. For example, deploy Data Loss Prevention (DLP) software to catch or block employees pasting protected information into chatbots. Security vendors now offer AI firewalls and prompt-scanning tools that flag or filter malicious instructions before they reach the model.
Finally, log and monitor AI interactions: unusual prompts or unexpected AI outputs should trigger alerts. By combining classic cyber hygiene with these AI-specific controls, companies can put guardrails around their AI use.
Staying vigilant is key. Prompt injection and AI data leakage are real, emerging threats, not mere hypotheticals. By understanding how these attacks work and applying layered defences, business leaders can harness generative AI’s benefits without handing over the keys to the vault.